Older Cut Diamonds

One of my main goals is to inform each and every client about the gemological information in relation to the item they are purchasing. On this web site I make every effort to list as many things about that particular item, so as to fully inform you prior to any purchase. Often the question comes up, as to the difference between "Old Mine Cut" Diamonds (O.M.C.) and "Old European Cut" Diamonds (O.E.C.)? The description below should help in understanding the difference between these two cutting styles.

 

    ?    

               Old Mine Cut                            Old European Cut

Question:      

What is the difference between "Old Mine Cut Diamond"  and "Old European Cut Diamond"?

Answer

It is sad to admit, but many Jewelers & Antique Dealers who handle diamonds on a regular basics, interchange  the two "names" without truly understanding the difference between these two styles of cutting, and their  many  "transitions" along the way. Starting with the "Old Mine Cut", with its square shape and slowly changing to the "Old European Cut" with its round shape.  By  studying  the  cutting  style  of  the  diamond,  one  can determine the actual circa (with in a few years), that the diamond was actually cut from the rough. The descriptions below will give you a better understand these differences.

q      Old Mine Cut = Square in shape, small table, no point on the culet & could be off center. That is to say that the cut diamond generally has the same shape as the original crystalline structure of the diamond when it was in the rough, (Rather square in appearance)

q      Late Transitional Old Mine Cut = The same as above but with some rounding of the girdle, small table, no point on the culet and it may or may not be centered, (Getting a bit rounder, but still somewhat square)

q   Early Transitional Old European Cut = Almost a round girdle but not perfectly round at this point, small table, no point on the culet and almost centered.  That is to say that this diamond has all the cutting characteristic of an Old European Cut Diamond, except that it is not fully round, as an Old European Cut should be. The girdle “almost round”, but it shows a bit of the “square ness” that is normally associated with an Old Mine Cut Diamond. Thus its classification is an Early Transitional- Old European Cut, a period of cutting and time when diamond cutting was making the transition from Old Mine Cut to Old European Cut. ("Almost Round, but not actually round")

q      Old European Cut = A round girdle, small table, no point on the culet and it should be relatively centered. (At last the Diamond is Round)

q      Late Transitional Old European Cut = A round girdle, the table is getting wider, and the culet may have a point or almost a point and be centered. The transition of cutting is approaching the modern brilliant cut, but the diamond does not have the mathematical proportions to be classified as a modern brilliant cut, a period of cutting and time when diamond cutting was making the transition from Old European Cut to an Modern Brilliant Cut. (Round, and the table is still a bit small)

q       Modern Brilliant Cut = A round girdle, the depth is 57.0 to 63,0%, the table is a 53.0 to 66.0 % of the width, the pavilion depth is 41.5 to 45.5%, the crown height should be 11.0 to 16.2% of the overall depth, and the crown angle is 30.0 to 35.0 degrees. There should be a good point on the girdle and it should be centered. (Gemological Cutting Perfection)

~~~~~   ~~~~~   ~~~~~   ~~~~~

Another basic explanation:

          Old Mine Cut Diamond

1. If the diamond has a somewhat square shape and the culet (the diamond point) does not come to a point it is an Old Mine Cut Diamond.

          Old European Cut Diamond

2. If the diamond has a round shape, with a small table and the culet (the diamond point) does not come to a point, it is a Old European Cut Diamond.

~~~~~   ~~~~~   ~~~~~   ~~~~~

An easy way to remember:

  1. Square=OMC

  2. Round= OEC

~~~~~   ~~~~~   ~~~~~   ~~~~~

I hope the above explanation is helpful in understanding the difference between these two diamond cutting styles that relate directly to the period of when a particular diamond was cut. With this knowledge, one can properly assign an proper circa for that particular diamond. Since diamonds in many cases are re-set into other pieces of jewelry, as a result there are times when an item can have several different ages assigned to that same item of jewelry.

 Example: Multiple periods

"The major 1.00 ct. Old-Mine-Cut Diamond, circa 1880's, and the ring circa 1920", thus there positive indication that this "older-cut-diamond" was re-set into a newer style ring thirty years later. Likewise sixty years later, someone's granddaughter could have the same diamond re-set again into a more up-to-date ring mounting. Consequently any qualified appraiser should not only evaluate the age of the gemstones, but they should have vast understanding of the various motifs, findings, manufacturing methods ect., that relate to a particular style of jewelry when assigning a proper circa for that item. All of these indicators are there "speaking" to the appraiser, as one views that item of jewelry, but more importantly it is the knowledge and comprehension of what these indicators are telling you, that is critical when assigning a proper circa for a particular item of jewelry.

Walt Tofel

"Your Master Jeweler"

 

 

 [Return to Previous Page]  [Home]

 

 


©Tofeljewelers.com